Yippee! We are over a year and a half away from the election and the Clinton campaign has already started using its typical playground tactics of pulling pigtails then smirking and saying “who me?” when the victims point the finger.
In case you missed it, the big three of Dreamworks SKG, Spielberg, Katzenberg and Geffen, held a 1.3 million dollar Hollywood fundraising event for presidential hopeful, Barack Obama on Tuesday, February 20. In and of itself, this is something of a slap to the Clinton campaign as Hollywood, and Geffen in particular were former FOBs (friends of Bill). I imagine having these entertainment and fundraising powerhouses come out in favor of another candidate was a bitter pill for Her Majesty to swallow.
To make matters worse, David Geffen, the G is SKG and the mogul behind Geffen records, had the following to say in Maureen Dowd’s NYT column on Wednesday: “Everybody in politics lies. But they (the Clintons) do it with such ease, it's troubling”. He went on to say: “Obama is inspirational and he's not from the Bush royal family or the Clinton royal family," and added that Hillary is an "incredibly polarizing figure" who would not be able to bring the country together and other further the divide between red and blue.
The Clinton campaign immediately retaliated, calling for Obama to apologize to the Clintons and foreswear from using personal attacks on the campaign trail. Hillary’s communication director Howard Wolfson said: “If Senator Obama is indeed sincere about his repeated claims to change the tone of our politics, he should immediately denounce these remarks, remove Mr. Geffen from his campaign and return his money” Effectively, he's calling Obama a hypocrite.
Hillary herself took a smirky, smarmy, “I’m intellectually superior that thou” approach and claimed to a crowd of supporters that she was “above” using such back alley dirty tactics and mud slinging and only wanted to “talk about the issues and what is important to America.”
Barack, a man seemingly possessed with common sense and a bit of wisdom, logically responded:
“It's not clear to me why I'd be apologizing for someone else's remark.”
Ooh! I’m already starting to swoon over this guy. He's dreamy!
In case you missed it, the big three of Dreamworks SKG, Spielberg, Katzenberg and Geffen, held a 1.3 million dollar Hollywood fundraising event for presidential hopeful, Barack Obama on Tuesday, February 20. In and of itself, this is something of a slap to the Clinton campaign as Hollywood, and Geffen in particular were former FOBs (friends of Bill). I imagine having these entertainment and fundraising powerhouses come out in favor of another candidate was a bitter pill for Her Majesty to swallow.
To make matters worse, David Geffen, the G is SKG and the mogul behind Geffen records, had the following to say in Maureen Dowd’s NYT column on Wednesday: “Everybody in politics lies. But they (the Clintons) do it with such ease, it's troubling”. He went on to say: “Obama is inspirational and he's not from the Bush royal family or the Clinton royal family," and added that Hillary is an "incredibly polarizing figure" who would not be able to bring the country together and other further the divide between red and blue.
The Clinton campaign immediately retaliated, calling for Obama to apologize to the Clintons and foreswear from using personal attacks on the campaign trail. Hillary’s communication director Howard Wolfson said: “If Senator Obama is indeed sincere about his repeated claims to change the tone of our politics, he should immediately denounce these remarks, remove Mr. Geffen from his campaign and return his money” Effectively, he's calling Obama a hypocrite.
Hillary herself took a smirky, smarmy, “I’m intellectually superior that thou” approach and claimed to a crowd of supporters that she was “above” using such back alley dirty tactics and mud slinging and only wanted to “talk about the issues and what is important to America.”
Barack, a man seemingly possessed with common sense and a bit of wisdom, logically responded:
“It's not clear to me why I'd be apologizing for someone else's remark.”
Ooh! I’m already starting to swoon over this guy. He's dreamy!

All I’ve heard since Bush took the White House is how they (the Bush administration) can’t abide criticism and work to silence opposition (and they do, I may return to the subject of Scooter Libby someday, cmon dude, you know you did it, just fess up) but Hillary seems to believe that her opponent should have some sort of magical-Obama power over American voters and should be able to render them mute with a wave of his hand. What does Obama have to do with what Geffen thinks? Isnt Geffen an American citizen with the right to say what he thinks? Now if Geffen was in support of cat-rape, child-tossing and the beating of the elderly, then yeah, maybe he should return the money (because Im strongly anti cat-rape). But Geffen calling the Clinton’s liars? Please! If anything we should chide him for stating the obvious. "oooh! You figure that out all by yourself Davey???"
Did you catch this one? In April of 1995, while she was First Lady (lady my ass), Hillary had a chance to meet Sir Edmund Hillary, the first person to reach the summit of Mount Everest. Hillary then proceeded to tell reporters that she had been named after the famous mountain climber because her mother had read an article about him while she was pregnant and liked the name.
Ahem…I’ll save you the trouble of looking it up…Hillary was born in 1947 and Sir Edmund reached the peak in 1953.
Does lying come easy to the Clinton’s? You bet!
I don’t know about you, but when Bill wagged that finger at me on television, looked me straight in the eye and said “I did not have sexual relations with that woman”. I think I vomited in my mouth a little bit. Don’t you every wag that dirty Lewinsky-stained finger at me and act like you are my moral and intellectual superior! How jaded do you have to be to incorporate cigars into your…ah, but I digress.
Lets get back to Hillary. Remember her Senate race fundraising scandal? Peter Paul is a lawyer, entrepreneur and former partner of Stan Lee (much to Lee's chagrin). He is an all around sleeze bag who’s been convicted of fraud and drug related offenses (including trafficking). Well, guess who’s his buddy? That’s right. Paul raised over 1 million dollars for her Senate campaign, but when news of Paul’s background leaked out to the press, Hillary did the “right thing” and returned the $2000 contribution Paul made to her campaign. Somehow, Hillary reported that Stan Lee donated $250000 to her campaign, which her fervently denies, while the actually fundraiser only donated 2k? C’Mon!
Im not even going to get into Whitewater. "oh we cant find those files, oh wait, they were in this closet the whole time"
What bothers me about this latest Obama/Clinton tangle is that the Clinton campaign is back to its old tricks and daring us to call them out. They continually make incursions into the neutral zone to get the other side to flinch and respond. When they finally do, the FOH’s and FOB’s start howling and pointing fingers and accusing the other side of resorting to bad behavior.
(I wasn’t sure if I was going for a football or Star Trek analogy there so I just gave up on it)
If you are thinking about voting Clinton, spend some time looking at the Presidential pardons Bill gave out like Halloween candy to his billionaire crony buddies before he left office. You KNOW what a Clinton in the White House means. A vote for Hillary is not a vote for change, but a return to politics as usual and more campaign contributors with plots in Arlington National Cemetary.
The argument that “its time for a woman in the White House” makes me nauseous. Im all for a woman President, just not HER! ANYONE but her. Don’t be fooled either. Their campaign strategy is to make this about her being a woman. I’m already hearing story after story about “Is America ready for a woman in the White House? Lets see how far we have come with the next election.” People, a vote against Hillary is not a vote against woman. No more so than a vote for someone other than Obama is a vote against African Americans. We need to elect the best person possible. The last time we voted for someone “different” in order to make a “change”, look who we got. A guy who had to have his daddy get him every job he ever had and failed at everything he ever tried to do. If you want Pat Robertson as president, then go ahead and vote for Hillary in 2008. The backlash in 2012 will be monumental. Personally I blame Clinton and his trailer park antics for a madman loser like Bush getting elected. (I may talk about that in depth at later date)
Just think about things before supporting any candidate. Spend as much time with this decision as you would choosing a quarterback for your fantasy football team. Actually…spend more time! Think about what the candidates are saying and why they are saying it. Don’t let them get away with their typical two-faced re-interpretation of events
Did you catch this one? In April of 1995, while she was First Lady (lady my ass), Hillary had a chance to meet Sir Edmund Hillary, the first person to reach the summit of Mount Everest. Hillary then proceeded to tell reporters that she had been named after the famous mountain climber because her mother had read an article about him while she was pregnant and liked the name.
Ahem…I’ll save you the trouble of looking it up…Hillary was born in 1947 and Sir Edmund reached the peak in 1953.
Does lying come easy to the Clinton’s? You bet!
I don’t know about you, but when Bill wagged that finger at me on television, looked me straight in the eye and said “I did not have sexual relations with that woman”. I think I vomited in my mouth a little bit. Don’t you every wag that dirty Lewinsky-stained finger at me and act like you are my moral and intellectual superior! How jaded do you have to be to incorporate cigars into your…ah, but I digress.
Lets get back to Hillary. Remember her Senate race fundraising scandal? Peter Paul is a lawyer, entrepreneur and former partner of Stan Lee (much to Lee's chagrin). He is an all around sleeze bag who’s been convicted of fraud and drug related offenses (including trafficking). Well, guess who’s his buddy? That’s right. Paul raised over 1 million dollars for her Senate campaign, but when news of Paul’s background leaked out to the press, Hillary did the “right thing” and returned the $2000 contribution Paul made to her campaign. Somehow, Hillary reported that Stan Lee donated $250000 to her campaign, which her fervently denies, while the actually fundraiser only donated 2k? C’Mon!
Im not even going to get into Whitewater. "oh we cant find those files, oh wait, they were in this closet the whole time"
What bothers me about this latest Obama/Clinton tangle is that the Clinton campaign is back to its old tricks and daring us to call them out. They continually make incursions into the neutral zone to get the other side to flinch and respond. When they finally do, the FOH’s and FOB’s start howling and pointing fingers and accusing the other side of resorting to bad behavior.
(I wasn’t sure if I was going for a football or Star Trek analogy there so I just gave up on it)
If you are thinking about voting Clinton, spend some time looking at the Presidential pardons Bill gave out like Halloween candy to his billionaire crony buddies before he left office. You KNOW what a Clinton in the White House means. A vote for Hillary is not a vote for change, but a return to politics as usual and more campaign contributors with plots in Arlington National Cemetary.
The argument that “its time for a woman in the White House” makes me nauseous. Im all for a woman President, just not HER! ANYONE but her. Don’t be fooled either. Their campaign strategy is to make this about her being a woman. I’m already hearing story after story about “Is America ready for a woman in the White House? Lets see how far we have come with the next election.” People, a vote against Hillary is not a vote against woman. No more so than a vote for someone other than Obama is a vote against African Americans. We need to elect the best person possible. The last time we voted for someone “different” in order to make a “change”, look who we got. A guy who had to have his daddy get him every job he ever had and failed at everything he ever tried to do. If you want Pat Robertson as president, then go ahead and vote for Hillary in 2008. The backlash in 2012 will be monumental. Personally I blame Clinton and his trailer park antics for a madman loser like Bush getting elected. (I may talk about that in depth at later date)
Just think about things before supporting any candidate. Spend as much time with this decision as you would choosing a quarterback for your fantasy football team. Actually…spend more time! Think about what the candidates are saying and why they are saying it. Don’t let them get away with their typical two-faced re-interpretation of events
I'm not sure Ill be voting Obama. I like him and like what he stand for, but he's just so inexperienced that it makes me nervous. And if I can say that about him, where does that leave Hillary? Ill continue to follow the campaigns and save judgement for the end. At the moment, Edwards is actually looking pretty good. Ill discuss McCain at a later date.
Oh by the way, his birth name is William Jefferson Davis Clinton. He was not named for Thomas Jefferson, but the president of the Confederate states. How’s that for rewriting history?
Oh by the way, his birth name is William Jefferson Davis Clinton. He was not named for Thomas Jefferson, but the president of the Confederate states. How’s that for rewriting history?



